The Challenges of Teaching and
learning of Chemistry.
Lawrence
EDOMWONYI-OTU*1, Abraham AVAA2
1Department
of Chemical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
2Department
of Physics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
E-mail: osas1law@yahoo.com
*Corresponding
author: +2348035668515
Received: 29 September 2011 /
Accepted: 13 May 2011 / Published: 25 June 2011
Abstract
Chemistry
education has been identified to be one of the major bedrock for the
transformation of our national economy, and hence must be accorded adequate
attention. In this study, an attempt was made in ascertaining the remote causes
for the poor performances reported in recent times in chemistry at the senior
secondary level of education. About 80 persons were interviewed in the course
of this work ranging from ex-students, students to teachers. Teacher variables,
student variables and environment-related variables were investigated and the
findings showed that these all contribute greatly to the poor performances of
students in science subjects and chemistry in particular. The chemistry
teacher, students, parents, senior secondary school administrators, curriculum
planners, and the government are therefore faced with the daunting challenge of
re-awaking interest and providing enabling environment for the effective
teaching of chemistry in particular and the sciences in general.
Keywords
Chemistry;
Laboratory; Performance; Variable; Science; Teachers.
Introduction
Education,
particularly Science and Technical education, is the ‘factory’ for the
production of the needed technologists, technicians and craftsmen as well as
skilled artisans who are required to turn the nation’s economy around and usher
in the desired technological advancement which is very much required for the
elevation of Nigeria from a ‘consumer nation’ to a ‘producer nation’; from a
‘developing nation’ to a ‘developed nation’ [1]. Acquisition of appropriate
scientific and technological skills is necessary to cope with the challenge
presented by the evolving needs of modern work place in our industries and the
ever growing non-formal sector. Education and training systems that responds
adequately to these demands will therefore, contribute to the efforts to
overcome the growing unemployment and marginalization of majority of the
populace. By providing access to appropriate learning experience designed to
broaden skills and knowledge can increase productivity and significantly
improve the fortunes of the unemployed, thereby reducing poverty and unemployment
amongst our youth.
It is
against this background that science education has been accorded a prime
position worldwide. Within the context of science education, Chemistry has been
identified as a very important science subject and its importance in scientific
and technological development of any nation has been widely reported [2]. It
was as a result of the recognition given to Chemistry in the development of the
individual and the nation that it was made a core – subject among the natural
sciences and other science – related courses in Nigerian education system [2].
It has been a pre-requisite subject for offering most science oriented courses
in the tertiary institution and this calls for the need in teaching it
effectively.
Chemistry
teaching is suppose to be result oriented and students centred, and this can
only be achieved when students are willing and the teachers are favourably
disposed, using the appropriate methods and resources in teaching the students
[2]. Students by nature are curios; they need to be actively involved in the
learning process in which they are continuously equipping, testing, speculating
and building their own personal construct and knowledge. It is only by
personalizing such knowledge that it becomes valid, meaningful and useful to
them. In chemistry, students need to actively construct their own personal
awareness and meaning [3]. To substantiate the argument, Usman [4] remarked
that the brain is not a passive consumer of information and to learn with
understanding, a learner must actively construct meaning of what to be learned.
Despite the
prime position chemistry occupies in our educational system and the efforts
made by researchers to enhance performance, students’ performance in chemistry
and sciences in general are still low. Some of the reasons identified for this
failure are laboratory inadequacy, teachers’ attitude, examination malpractice,
time constraint for conduction of practice’s, non-coverage of syllabus, class
size, non-professionalism and environment.
Science
practical in schools is aimed at giving the students the opportunity to gain
meaningful learning, acquire appropriate skills and attitudes that enable them
live and contribute to the development of society.
Statement of
Problem
In view of
the above factors suspected to be some of the reasons why students performance
in chemistry continue to decline, this study was to investigate the low
achievement in chemistry within some selected schools in Zaria ranging from
teacher variables (attitude, qualification, attendance at chemistry workshop,
condition of service), students variables (choice of career, attitude) and
environmental- related variables (class size, school location and laboratory
adequacy).
Methodology
An in-depth
interview was used for this work. Ten chemistry teachers from three selected
schools in Zaria were interviewed. A total number of sixty students selected
from SS1 and SS2, selected randomly, from the same three schools were also
interviewed. Five ex- students who failed chemistry from those schools were
also interviewed to ascertain some claims by some students. A number of
questions related to teacher attitudes, qualification, retraining, students
choice of discipline, attitudes and environmental related variables where asked
and there response recorded and analyzed.
Findings
Attitudes: It was
discovered that most teachers are in the teaching profession not by choice,
they consider it to be a waiting ground for better jobs. “We have not gotten
better jobs, we are just passing time” said one of the teachers. Such teachers
have no passion teaching the subject. “I have been teaching for the past
fifteen years now but my heart is not here”. This was another comment from a
teacher, so how can he put his best into what he does not consider a serious
job?
Under
students’ attitudes towards chemistry, some students had this to say “sometimes
I use to fail chemistry because, it is difficult to understand so I don’t have
much time for it”; “I did not like it too much, I prefer Physics to it”; “I did
not concentrate that’s why I failed while in school, but the moment I
concentrated I had a credit pass”.
Non-professionalism: This study
revealed that some teachers are teaching chemistry but they are not graduates
of chemistry. “I read textile science and technology”; “I read electrical
electronics but because of lack of teachers I have been asked to teach
chemistry”, yet another teacher remarked that he was a graduate of chemical
engineering but teaches chemistry.
Time Constraint: In some schools,
where the student population is large, the classes are divided into sets (set
I, II…) with two contacts of 40 minutes every week. While in some schools it is
four contacts of 40 minutes for other days, and 35 minutes on Fridays. When
asked if it is possible for them to cover their syllabus before the students
face their external examinations, some had this to say; “it is not possible to
cover unless you do some extra work outside your normal schedule but I am not
ready to do that now”; “you can’t cover because the syllabus is too wide, in
fact we use to carry SS2 work to SS3, one of my colleague who just came in
claim she use to cover the syllabus but for me I have been teaching for years
and I have not been able to cover it; “it is so hard to cover, what we do is to
skip some topics and brush over others”. Since most of the topics are better
understood when demonstrated, the teachers were asked whether it is possible
for them under 40 to 80 minutes. Their response was “if you try that you
encroach into another person’s period” ;”I don’t because the time is not
enough, we leave everything till when the students are preparing for WAEC and
NECO”.
Chemistry Workshop: Of the
number of teachers interviewed, only one had not attended a workshop on
teaching chemistry. “I have not attended any workshop since I started teaching
chemistry”; “I have attended many workshops and it has helped me in teaching”.
Class Size: Some
teachers were asked to what extent the size of their classes affect their
teaching. Their comments; “I have an average number of 90 students in a class
and I teach three classes, it has a negative effect on my efficiency because,
firstly, class management is a problem, secondly, I can’t be sure whether each
student is understanding or participating in the learning process”. Another
teacher responded; “I have a total 70 students in each of the classes I teach,
so I spend a lot of time controlling the class and the actual time for teaching
is very small and this affects the student’s performances in their final
examinations”
Conditions of service/
Remunerations: Poor remuneration and poor staff
welfare has destroyed the morale of most teachers. One of them noted; “With
this kind of chicken change I am collecting, do you think if a parent bring N40,000.00,
for me to teach his child during the exam, I will not collect? I have a family
to cater for”. Because of poor remuneration many have become petty traders
while abandoning their primary responsibilities. “I jump inside the bus travel
through the night to Lagos to buy clothes for sale just to make ends meet”.
Laboratory Adequacy: Chemistry is
a subject that involves a lot of demonstrations and can only be effectively
taught in the laboratory for easy access to instructional materials; however,
most schools lack essential facility. One of the students said “I wanted to be
a science student and started offering chemistry, but we have no lab and no
teacher, in fact the only experiment we did was simple pendulum in physics till
we wrote WAEC, and I failed chemistry”.
Another
student had this to say on the same issue “I am now about to finish SS2 and we
have just been introduced to the lab, but I don’t enjoy the experiment because
the place is not conducive, it is a zinc house”. In the same school, some students
denied having a lab, “it still under construction and we have never done any
practical since we started offering sciences”.
Some
teachers had this to say: “We have a temporary laboratory and not well
equipped, the place is not conducive and this makes the student not to
concentrate during practical lessons”; “we don’t conduct practical often, it is
usually a fire brigade approach when WAEC and NECO are approaching”.
Examination Malpractice: One of the
teachers noted that: “Most of the students choose to relax because of what will
come from their teachers and parents”. Another teacher observed that, “exam
malpractice affects the students to a very great extent, the students,
teachers, parents and invigilators are all involved. I have had to seize many solved
exam questions sent in by parents”. Yet, it takes an intelligent student to
cheat successfully.
Choice of Career: Some of the
students interviewed said they are into sciences by their own personal choice
not by compulsion, but one of them said “my parents insisted I must be a
science student because all my brothers are arts students and at least on of
you must be an engineer”.
Discussion
It could be
understood from the findings that the teaching profession has been reduced to a
transit job. For people awaiting better jobs, they don’t have passion for
teaching. Such attitude reflects in the way they teach their subjects, and this
has adverse effect on students’ performance. From the study it is evident that
students negative attitude towards chemistry is what often led to the low
performance we experience today, this is consistent with Ojo [5] and Adesokan’s
[6] assertions.
The study
also revealed that time constraint is one of the major factors responsible for
the poor performance. It is the reason while syllabuses are not covered,
science practical are not conducted. Students are also discouraged because it
requires so much attention and they are not ready to sacrifice the time meant
for other things. The number of periods given to chemistry per week and the
time allocated for each lesson is usually not enough for effective learning
because the teacher cannot conduct any meaningful practical within the time
limit.
Also
reported to have a negative impact on students’ performance in chemistry is laboratory
adequacy, which is an environmental factor [7]. From this study it was observed
that some students really felt they would have performed better if exposed to
practical lessons in good time. This is in line with Farounbi [8] who argued
that students tend to understand and recall what they see more than what they
hear as a result of using laboratories in the teaching of sciences, but most
schools lack functional laboratories.
On the
effect of examination malpractice, it was reported by some respondent that this
has done so much harm than good to students’ performance not only in chemistry
but generally in the sciences. It is obvious that students who did not learn
cannot perform and since examination is still the common index for measuring
performance especially in our society, passing has become a do or die affair
such that a teacher who did not do his work very well probably because of lack
of time but want to please the school and the parents indulge in exam
malpractice and the students come out colourful but no good knowledge of the
subject. The students are aware that even if they are not serious and well
taught, they will still be made to pass at the end either by their parents or
teachers. These findings collaborate with those of Angaye [9]. This could also
be explained as one of the reasons why Universities are now conducting
Post-UME.
Class size
was also identified by most respondents as a major hindrance for effective
teaching and learning. Chemistry requires getting the students involved, as most
of the topics involve demonstration, if they could be well understood but this
becomes very difficult when the class is large. This is also consistent with
Onocha [10] who found out that large class size is unconducive for serious
academic work.
Another
serious factor militating against students’ performance in sciences and
Chemistry in particular is that of non-professionalism. Most graduates claim to
teach or are compelled to teach any subject. This is more common in private and
state schools. We have cases where Engineers taught they could teach Physics,
Mathematics and Chemistry better than those who are actually trained to teach
the subject and in most cases are compelled to do so.
Poor
remuneration has also been identified as one of the factors which distracts
most teachers from their primary assignment as they get involved in other
activities that will enhance their living standard. Those who are not enabled,
commercially, are demoralized; they keep lamenting and seeking for better
opportunities. Those in private schools see themselves as been exploited.
Anyone who works with such a mindset cannot be effective, hence, with the
obvious consequence of poor performance on the part of the students.
Conclusion
It has been
established by this study that teacher-related factors and school environment
such as attitude, time, remuneration, laboratory adequacy and others, exert
remarkable influence on students’ positive achievement in chemistry. These
factors directly and indirectly points to areas which have to be addressed in
order to enhance the learning outcomes of students in chemistry. If the
government and other stakeholders in education industry could improve on the
learning environment of students and motivate teachers who are the curriculum implementers,
students performance will definitely improve.
References
1.
Avaa A., Improving
performance in the sciences. A support paper presented at a workshop held
at Federal Government Girls’ College Zaria, 2007.
2.
Adesoji F.A.,
Olatunbosun S., Student, Teacher and School Environmental factors as
Determinants of Achievement in Senior Secondary School Chemistry in Oyo State,
Nigeria. Uluslararası Sosyal Ara_tırmalar Dergisi. The Journal of International
Social Research, 2008, 1/2.
3.
Usman I.A., Relationship
between Students performance in practical Activities and their Academic
Achievement in Integrated Science using NISTEP mode of teaching,
Unpublished and Ph.D Thesis Dept. of Education A.B.U. Zaria, 2000.
4.
Usman I., Strategies
for conducting practical in Science, Technology and Mathematics. A lead
paper, presented at STAN workshop, at Federal Government Girls’ College Malali,
Kaduna, 2006.
5.
Ojo M.O., The
differential Effectiveness cooperative competitive and individual’s Goal
structures on students’ performance in chemistry. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University
of Ibadan, Ibadan, 1989.
6.
Adesokan C.O.,
Students Attitude and gender as Determinants of Performance in JSS Integrated
Science. Unpublished B.Ed Project Department of Chemistry, University
of Nigeria, Nsukka, 2002.
7.
Raimi S.M., Problem-solving
Techniques and Laboratory skills as supplements to Laboratory Teaching in Senior
Secondary School Students’ Learning of Volumetric Analysis.
Unpublished PhD Thesis University of Ibadan, Ibadan, 2002.
8.
Farounbi M.,
Resource concentration, utilization and management correlates of students’.
Learning outcomes: a study in school quality in Oyo State. Unpublished PhD Thesis
University of Ibadan, Ibadan, 1998.
9.
Angyaye
C.O., Information and communication Technology. A platform for Credible
Examination in Nigeria. A paper presented at the Conference on Examination
Security in Nigeria held in Abuja, 2007.
10.
Onocha C.
O., Patterns of Relationships Between Home and School Factors and Pupils’
Learning Outcome in Bendel Primary Science Project. Ministry of Education, Bendel
State, Nigeria, 1985.
No comments:
Post a Comment